The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Tuesday, fixed July 22 for ruling in the application by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) seeking to move the trial of former Abia State Governor, Orji Uzor Kalu in N7.1 billion fraud charges to Lagos.
Justice Inyang Ekwo fixed the date after EFCC’s lawyer, Oluwaleke Atolagbe, and Kalu’s, counsel, Professor Awa Kalu (SAN), adopted their final addresses for and against the application.
The anti-graft agency in the application argued that the money laundering charges for which the former governor was charged were committed in Lagos and not in Abuja, hence, his trial must hold in Lagos.
Atolagbe argued that the application was hinged on territorial jurisdiction, adding that since it has been established that the defendant committed the allege¹, he should be moved to the Lagos division in line with provisions of the law.
The EFCC’s lawyer insisted that the application was aimed at preventing the Abuja division of the Federal High Court from embarking on futile exercises in the trial and wastage of the precious time of the court in a matter where it has no jurisdiction.
However, Kalu, now a Senator, asked the court to dismiss the EFCC’s request on the ground that it has no valid criminal charges against him.
Kalu’s lawyer argued that the same court had, in an earlier ruling held he should not be subjected to double jeopardy, having been earlier tried, convicted and released.
He urged the court to first determine the status of the defendant on whether there is any valid charge against him before the issue of transfer of anything could be .
The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Tuesday, fixed July 22 for ruling in the application by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) seeking to move the trial of former Abia State Governor, Orji Uzor Kalu in N7.1 billion fraud charges to Lagos.
Justice Inyang Ekwo fixed the date after EFCC’s lawyer, Oluwaleke Atolagbe, and Kalu’s, counsel, Professor Awa Kalu (SAN), adopted their final addresses for and against the application.
The anti-graft agency in the application argued that the money laundering charges for which the former governor was charged were committed in Lagos and not in Abuja, hence, his trial must hold in Lagos.
Atolagbe argued that the application was hinged on territorial jurisdiction, adding that since it has been established that the defendant committed the allege¹, he should be moved to the Lagos division in line with provisions of the law.
The EFCC’s lawyer insisted that the application was aimed at preventing the Abuja division of the Federal High Court from embarking on futile exercises in the trial and wastage of the precious time of the court in a matter where it has no jurisdiction.
However, Kalu, now a Senator, asked the court to dismiss the EFCC’s request on the ground that it has no valid criminal charges against him.
Kalu’s lawyer argued that the same court had, in an earlier ruling held he should not be subjected to double jeopardy, having been earlier tried, convicted and released.
He urged the court to first determine the status of the defendant on whether there is any valid charge against him before the issue of transfer of anything could be considered.
