Thursday, 21 Aug 2025
Subscribe
TrackNews Logo
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Niger Delta
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Crime
  • Editorial
  • 🔥
  • News
  • Politics
  • National
  • Sports
  • Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Breaking News
  • Gist
  • Health
Font ResizerAa
Track NewsTrack News
Search
Follow US
©2025 Track News Media. All Rights Reserved. | Website Designed By AfeesHost
Home » Blog » Electoral Act: Senate Reacts To Judgement Ordering Removal Of Section 84 (12)
National

Electoral Act: Senate Reacts To Judgement Ordering Removal Of Section 84 (12)

Last updated: March 19, 2022 10:33 pm
Track News
Share
SHARE

The Senate has reacted to a court ruling ordering the Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, to delete Section 84 (12) from the amended Electoral Act.

Recall that the Federal High Court sitting in Umahia, Abia State, on Friday directed Malami to remove the controversial section 84 (12) from the recently-signed law.

Justice Evelyn Anyadike noted that Section 84 (12) is unconstitutional, invalid, illegal, null, void and of no effect whatsoever as it cannot stand when it is in violation of the clear provisions of the constitution.

The Judge ruled that sections 66(1)(f), 107(1)(f), 137(1)(f) and 182(1)(f) of the 1999 constitution already stipulated that appointees of government seeking to contest elections were only to resign at least 30 days to the date of the election.

Reacting to the judgement, Malami in a statement signed by his media aide, Umar Gwandu, promised to comply with the court ruling and delete the section from the signed electoral act.

In a chat with reporters on Friday, Senate Spokesman, Senator Ajibola Basiru, said the Red Chamber was not aware of the court case on the Electoral Act.

Basiru added that the National Assembly was not notified that it was a party to the case, adding that he cannot comment on the ruling without seeing the certified true copy of the judgement.

He said: “I’m not aware of the suit and whether the National Assembly was a party or was served and/or represented.

“I have also not seen or read the judgment or whether the National Assembly has been served with the judgment or any order of the court. I cannot react to newspaper reports of court judgment without seeing the actual court judgment.”

TAGGED:Electoral Act: Senate Reacts To Judgement Ordering Removal Of Section 84 (12)
Share This Article
Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article 2023: Ortom Denies Plan To Return To APC
Next Article Algeria Recalls Spain Envoy Over Western Sahara Policy Change
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your Trusted Source for Accurate and Timely Updates!

Our commitment to accuracy, impartiality, and delivering breaking news as it happens has earned us the trust of a vast audience. Stay ahead with real-time updates on the latest events, trends.
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
LinkedInFollow
MediumFollow
QuoraFollow
- Advertisement -
Ad image

You Might Also Like

Fraud: FCID Grills National Assembly Staff Leaders

By
afees4me

National Assembly approves Kogi’s request for $100m loan from AfDB

By
Track News
National

Tinubu Presidency Says Daily Earnings of N1,500 Considered Significant for Many Nigerians

By
Awe Dasme

Nnamdi Kanu: You’re Torturing Him Psychologically, Mentally – Lawyer Replies DSS

By
Track News
Track News
Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram

About US

Track News is a leading news site with a primary focus on Nigeria and world news in general. Stay informed with our real-time coverage across politics, tech, entertainment, and more. Your reliable source for 24/7 news.

Top Categories
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Niger Delta
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Crime
  • Editorial
Usefull Links

© Track News Media. All Rights Reserved. | Website Designed By AfeesHost

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?